Finance, treasury and procurement teams are drowning in data. But buried in that data are opportunities to boost efficiency, stay competitive, and meet compliance demands. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) allow businesses to process massive data sets asynchronously, a capability long used in content moderation and auditing, now being extended to transactional data for insights across supply chain and customer domains.
In this post, we share:
You may be familiar with using an LLM interactively, “chatting” to complete tasks or generate ideas. The same real-time interaction is possible between systems via single-request API calls, mirroring human–computer dialogue. However, this approach still demands immediate compute power, making it costly and inefficient when working with hundreds, thousands, or even millions of records. Batch LLM inference, by contrast, enables large-scale processing in the background as a single structured job, delivering analysis and insights at scale.
If your business is already using AI, you may have run into challenges around cost, prompt engineering, or tool limitations. Batch processing solves many of these by letting you submit and manage thousands of structured prompts at once—saving time and unlocking new capabilities, especially in data-rich domains like:
Batch inference is not suited for real-time applications like customer support or conversational interfaces—but it’s ideal for large-scale offline analysis like these.
Working with LLMs in batch mode is different from chat-style interaction. It requires preparing structured inputs, managing uploads, and handling the results. The basic steps are:
Choosing between Amazon Bedrock and OpenAI for batch inference depends on your priorities: Bedrock offers more control, scalability, and model variety but demands significantly greater setup and technical overhead. OpenAI, on the other hand, enables faster development and easier iteration thanks to its simplicity and small-batch flexibility—ideal for teams prioritising speed and ease of use over infrastructure customisation.
Category | Amazon Bedrock | OpenAI |
Best for… | Enterprises needing full control | Teams wanting speed and simplicity |
Infrastructure | High flexibility, high complexity (S3, IAM, regional model access) | Minimal setup, limited control |
Documentation | Comprehensive but assumes AWS knowledge | Streamlined guides tailored to batch use |
Code Effort | Moderate to high; 100-request batch minimum slows iteration | Low; no batch size minimum enables fast prototyping |
LLM Models | Multiple providers, wide choice, more complexity | Single provider, proven quality, strong support |
Cost | Slightly higher: $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens (Claude 3.5) | More competitive: $1.25 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens (GPT-4o) |
Execution Time | Fast at scale; 25K+ batches can complete in ~20 mins if input is valid | Slower for large jobs; better for small or test batches |
Reliability | Sensitive to invalid input; jobs may fail late without early warnings | Robust feedback loop; clear errors and fast debug cycles |
Note: Costs and features are accurate at the time of publication (May 2025). However, this is a rapidly evolving field, and everything is subject to sudden, unannounced changes.
Batch inference isn’t just a technical feature, it’s a strategic advantage. Finance teams using LLMs to unlock insights at scale are not just saving time, they’re making smarter, faster decisions. Whether the goal is better supplier relationships, improved ESG compliance, or working capital efficiency, the ability to process transactional data intelligently will define tomorrow’s leaders.
At Previse, we believe in turning data into decisions—reliably, securely, and at scale.